English Language Arts
Grade 10
15 min
Choose the analysis that logically connects the evidence to the claim
Choose the analysis that logically connects the evidence to the claim
Tutorial Preview
1
Introduction & Learning Objectives
Learning Objectives
Differentiate between summary, evidence, and analysis in an argumentative paragraph.
Identify the explicit claim and supporting evidence within a sample argument.
Evaluate the logical strength of the connection between a piece of evidence and a claim.
Articulate the unstated assumption (warrant) that links evidence to a claim.
Select the most effective and logical analysis from multiple options to support a given claim and evidence.
Explain precisely why a piece of analysis successfully forges a logical connection, while another fails.
Ever presented clear facts in an argument, only to have someone respond with '...and your point is?' 🤔 That missing piece is what we're mastering today.
This tutorial focuses on the most critical skill in p...
2
Key Concepts & Vocabulary
TermDefinitionExample
ClaimThe central argument or thesis of a piece of writing. It is a debatable statement that the writer aims to prove.In Shakespeare's *Julius Caesar*, Brutus is not a villain but a tragic hero whose noble intentions are corrupted by political manipulation.
EvidenceThe specific facts, statistics, quotations, or examples used to support and prove the claim.In his soliloquy, Brutus states, 'It must be by his death: and for my part, / I know no personal cause to spurn at him, / But for the general good.'
Analysis (or Reasoning)The explanation of *how* and *why* the evidence supports the claim. It interprets the evidence and connects it back to the main argument.Brutus's own words reveal his internal conflict; he acts not out of personal hatred for Cae...
3
Key Rules & Conventions
The Claim-Evidence-Reasoning (CER) Model
Structure your arguments by stating a Claim, providing Evidence, and explaining your Reasoning (Analysis).
Use this as a blueprint for body paragraphs. The Claim is your topic sentence. The Evidence is your proof (e.g., a quote). The Reasoning is your 2-3 sentences of analysis explaining how the proof supports the topic sentence.
The 'So What?' Test
After presenting a piece of evidence, always ask yourself, 'So what? Why does this matter for my claim?'
Your analysis is the answer to this question. If your analysis just repeats the evidence in new words, it fails the test. It must explain the evidence's significance, implication, or meaning in relation to the claim.
Analysis vs. Summary
Analysis interpret...
4 more steps in this tutorial
Sign up free to access the complete tutorial with worked examples and practice.
Sign Up Free to ContinueSample Practice Questions
Challenging
Consider the following argument: Claim: The city's recycling program is ineffective. Evidence: Last year, the city spent $2 million on the program, but only 15% of household waste was actually recycled. Analysis: Spending $2 million to only recycle 15% of waste is not a good use of money. Therefore, the program is ineffective. What is the most significant weakness in this analysis?
A.The analysis relies on statistics, which can be misleading.
B.The analysis makes a logical leap by assuming that 'ineffective' is solely defined by cost-efficiency, without considering other potential goals like environmental awareness or legal compliance.
C.The analysis is too short and does not use enough sophisticated vocabulary.
D.The analysis summarizes the evidence instead of interpreting it.
Challenging
Claim: The novel *Frankenstein* critiques the pursuit of knowledge without moral responsibility. Evidence: After creating the monster, Victor Frankenstein says, 'I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart.' Which analysis most effectively articulates the unstated warrant connecting the evidence to the claim?
A.Victor's immediate regret and disgust serve as the novel's core judgment against his actions. The analysis makes explicit the warrant that a scientific pursuit leading to 'horror and disgust' rather than satisfaction is an indication of a moral transgression, thereby supporting the claim that his ambition was devoid of responsibility.
B.This quote shows that Victor worked very hard to achieve his goal, but he was ultimately unhappy with the result of his scientific experiment.
C.The contrast between Victor's initial 'ardour' and his final 'horror' highlights his emotional journey and the psychological toll of his creation.
D.By creating the monster, Victor Frankenstein was playing God, which is a dangerous thing for a scientist to do and is the main reason for his downfall.
Challenging
Claim: The proposed four-day school week will negatively impact low-income families. Evidence: A study of a rural district that implemented a four-day week found that student households spent an average of $15 more per week on childcare and food for the extra day off. Analysis: This extra cost of $15 per week could be a significant burden for families already struggling financially. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the logical connection in this analysis?
A.The study also found that teacher morale increased significantly in the district.
B.The district's median household income is 20% below the national average.
C.Many parents in the district reported enjoying the extra day with their children.
D.The study was published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.
Want to practice and check your answers?
Sign up to access all questions with instant feedback, explanations, and progress tracking.
Start Practicing Free